UniPaith

For institutions

Less paperwork. Better applicant context.
Faster review.

Structure applicant packets, run one review queue, and keep AI support audit-ready, all in one place.

What you get

Structured packets

Profile, documents, essays, interviews, requirements, and timeline in one review-ready file.

More +

One review queue

Missing items, reviewer progress, interviews, status changes, and follow-ups tracked together.

More +

Audit-ready AI support

AI assists with summaries, flags, and routing. People stay in control.

More +

01 · Structured packets

See the applicant. Not the paperwork.

Each applicant packet keeps profile, materials, requirements, notes, and timeline together.

DashboardAD

214current cycle

31missing items

92%on-time review

A. RiveraProfile + essay

S. ChenChecklist gap

02 · Reach

Reach the students who fit.

Publish programs, surface fit, and guide the right students toward the right next step.

ApplicantsAD

A. Riveraone structured packet — complete, comparable, ready for review

ProfileDocumentsEssaysInterview

03 · Review

Humans decide. The system remembers.

Rubrics, reviewer notes, blind reads, flags, and changes stay traceable.

ReviewAD

Reviewer A · completeReviewer B · completeBlind read ready

09:51 — Integrity flag routed to human review. Logged.

DashboardAD

214current cycle

31missing items

92%on-time review

A. RiveraProfile + essay

S. ChenChecklist gap

Inside UniPaith

Everything your admissions team needs from first inquiry to final decision.

Dashboard

Cycle volume, missing items, reviewer progress, and on-time review in one view, so the team always knows where the cycle stands.

Applicant Packets

Profile, documents, essays, interviews, requirements, notes, and timeline in one structured, comparable, review-ready file — whichever channel the materials arrive from.

One Review Queue

Applications, missing items, interviews, status changes, and follow-ups tracked together instead of scattered across tools.

Program Publishing

Publish programs, requirements, and deadlines so the right students can find them and arrive prepared.

Fit + Readiness Signals

Review order supported by fit, readiness, cycle goals, and likelihood signals — each shown with the reason behind it.

Cycle Timeline

Deadlines, interview schedules, review milestones, and decision releases on one admissions calendar.

Messaging

Missing-item requests, interview invites, clarification questions, and status updates — follow up at scale without losing application context.

Analytics

Funnel, completeness, and review-progress views that show how the cycle is actually moving.

Review Workspace

Rubrics, blind reads, reviewer notes, flags, and decisions stay consistent and traceable — and release stays a human call.

Audit + Permissions

Consent controls what student data moves; important changes, flags, overrides, and releases are recorded. People stay in control.

Dashboard

Know where the cycle stands without assembling the answer.

The dashboard turns the moving parts of an admissions cycle into one operating view. Volume, blockers, review pace, and release readiness stay visible before they become end-of-cycle surprises.

01 / Cycle at a glance
Start with the answer, then inspect the detail.
Current volume, missing materials, completion, and on-time review appear together. Teams can understand the health of the cycle in seconds and move into the queue only when something needs attention.
02 / Blockers surfaced early
See what is stuck while there is still time to act.
Missing transcripts, interview scheduling, and incomplete recommendations are grouped by urgency. Each blocker stays tied to the applicant and the next responsible action.
03 / Review pace in view
Balance the work without losing review quality.
Reviewer assignments, completed reads, and aging work are visible side by side. Managers can rebalance workload while every rubric, note, and decision remains owned by a person.

Applicant Packets

Every applicant arrives as one structured, review-ready file.

Applicant context should not be scattered across inboxes, portals, and attachments. UniPaith brings the full record together without flattening the person behind it.

01 / Everything together
One packet, one place to understand the applicant.
Profile, coursework, documents, essays, interviews, requirements, and reviewer notes share one structure. Reviewers spend less time assembling context and more time evaluating it.
02 / Complete and source-aware
Every item keeps its status and provenance.
The packet shows what was supplied, what is verified, where it came from, and what remains incomplete. A reviewer can inspect the evidence without guessing which version is current.
03 / Comparable with context
Use a common structure without reducing applicants to rows.
Shared fields make comparison faster, while essays, activities, circumstances, and source notes remain available beside the structured record. Consistency supports judgment instead of replacing it.

One Review Queue

One operating queue from intake through decision.

The review queue connects status, readiness, assignments, and communication. Every handoff stays visible and every next action stays attached to the application it belongs to.

01 / Triage in one place
Move from intake to review without rebuilding the list.
Applications, missing items, interviews, and reviewer assignments live in one queue. Filters change the view, not the underlying source of truth.
02 / Priority with reasons
Support review order with evidence people can inspect.
Fit, readiness, cycle goals, and aging can help surface what needs attention. The reason is shown with the signal so staff can accept, question, or override it.
03 / Follow-up in context
Resolve the blocker without leaving the application.
A selected applicant opens with the missing item, relevant timeline, and message history together. Follow-up becomes part of the case record instead of a detached inbox task.

Program Publishing

Publish the program once and keep requirements clear everywhere.

A structured program record gives students accurate guidance and gives admissions teams one maintainable source for requirements, deadlines, costs, and outcomes.

01 / Build the program record
Turn institutional knowledge into clear, structured information.
Program format, location, cost, outcomes, contacts, and application details are edited together. Required fields keep the public record complete without forcing every program into identical copy.
02 / Requirements and deadlines
Make readiness visible before a student applies.
Academic requirements, documents, recommendations, interviews, and deadline rules are explicit. Students can prepare earlier and staff receive fewer preventable incomplete applications.
03 / Preview and publish
See the student-facing result before it goes live.
The publishing preview shows how requirements and key facts will appear in discovery and matching. Changes remain draftable, reviewable, and attributable before release.

Fit + Readiness Signals

Use signals to focus attention, not automate judgment.

Signals can help teams find the work that needs attention, but they should never become unexplained verdicts. UniPaith keeps the evidence, uncertainty, and human decision boundary visible.

01 / See the signal
Separate fit, readiness, and confidence.
A single rank hides too much. Distinct signals show alignment, completeness, and confidence so reviewers understand what the system knows and where the evidence is thin.
02 / Understand the reason
Every signal opens into plain-language evidence.
Reasons connect applicant context to program requirements, strengths, and remaining gaps. Reviewers can trace the signal back to the packet instead of trusting a number on its own.
03 / Human control
The queue can be supported. The decision cannot be delegated.
Staff can change ordering, dismiss a signal, or record an override. The interface treats AI output as reviewable evidence and preserves the person responsible for each action.

Cycle Timeline

Turn every deadline and milestone into one shared cycle.

The cycle timeline connects applicant deadlines, staff work, interviews, committee milestones, and release windows so dependencies are visible before they slip.

01 / Map the cycle
See the work as one connected admissions calendar.
Submission windows, document cutoffs, interviews, committee dates, and release milestones share one view. Teams can scan the cycle by week or focus on a single cohort.
02 / Catch dependencies
Know what must happen before the next milestone can move.
A milestone detail view exposes unresolved documents, unassigned reads, and pending interviews. Dependencies stay attached to owners and applicants rather than becoming a separate checklist.
03 / Control release
Coordinate decisions without releasing them early.
Decision groups show readiness, approvals, and planned release time together. Release remains gated and explicit, with a record of who approved the final action.

Messaging

Follow up at scale without separating messages from applications.

Admissions communication works best when the request, applicant, requirement, and response history stay together. Messaging becomes part of the workflow instead of another system to reconcile.

01 / One contextual inbox
See the conversation beside the application state.
Threads are organized by applicant and purpose, with missing items, interview status, and assigned staff visible beside the messages. Context follows the conversation automatically.
02 / Send the right request
Start from the missing action, not a blank message.
A focused composer can prepare a document request, interview invitation, or clarification while preserving a human review step. The sender controls the final wording and timing.
03 / Delivery and response
Know what was sent, received, and resolved.
Delivery, response, and requirement status appear on one activity line. When an applicant responds, the related blocker can move without losing the communication record.

Analytics

See how the cycle is moving while there is still time to act.

Operational analytics should reveal bottlenecks, not merely report the final class. UniPaith connects funnel movement, completeness, and review progress to the work teams can still change.

01 / Watch the funnel
Understand movement from inquiry through decision.
Stage counts and conversion show where applicants are moving, pausing, or leaving. Filters let teams compare programs and cohorts without rebuilding the report.
02 / Find completeness gaps
Spot recurring missing items before they become volume problems.
Completeness views group open requirements by type, program, and age. Teams can identify whether the issue is applicant-specific or a pattern in instructions and process.
03 / Balance review progress
See throughput and aging without turning review into a race.
Completed reads, current workload, and aging bands are shown together. The view supports staffing decisions while keeping quality controls and human ownership intact.

Review Workspace

Make every read consistent, collaborative, and traceable.

The review workspace gives each reader the evidence and structure they need while preserving independent judgment, documented collaboration, and a clear release boundary.

01 / Blind review
Start with the evidence the process intends reviewers to see.
Blind-read settings hide selected identity fields while preserving the relevant academic and contextual record. The workspace makes the active review mode explicit to every reader.
02 / Rubrics and notes
Keep structured evaluation and human reasoning together.
Rubric dimensions, notes, supporting evidence, and flags share one review surface. Reviewers can explain a judgment without converting the applicant into a score alone.
03 / Decision and release
People make the call, and the system records it.
Recommendations, committee status, overrides, and final release controls remain distinct. A decision cannot move to release without the required human approvals.

Audit + Permissions

Know what moved, why it moved, and who approved it.

Trust depends on more than a policy page. Permissions, provenance, overrides, and releases need to be visible in the product and reviewable after the fact.

01 / Consent sets the boundary
Make access specific, visible, and revocable.
Permission scope shows which profile areas can be used, by whom, and for what purpose. Student-controlled sharing remains separate from internal staff roles and review assignments.
02 / Provenance
Trace important information back to its source.
The data trace connects a field to its source, verification state, and updates. Reviewers can distinguish supplied evidence, institutional data, and system-generated interpretation.
03 / Audit ledger
Record the changes that matter to trust.
Flags, overrides, permission changes, and decision releases produce a readable ledger entry with actor, time, and reason. The record supports accountability without replacing human review.

Internal trial

Internal trial. No charge.

Request a demo by email and we'll set your admissions team up.

Request an institution demo

Opens an email to help@unipaith.co.

Questions

Good to know.

What does it cost?

There is no charge during the internal trial. Request an institution demo by email at help@unipaith.co and we'll set your team up.

How deep do we have to adopt it?

Start with a focused workflow, such as structured packets or review support, then expand when the value is proven.

Where does the matching data come from?

Matching uses structured student context, program requirements, and permissioned institutional data where available.

Admissions should befaster, clearer, and easier to trust.

Request an institution demo

Opens an email to help@unipaith.co.

Less paperwork. Better applicant context.Faster review.

What you get

Structured packets

One review queue

Audit-ready AI support

See the applicant. Not the paperwork.

Reach the students who fit.

Humans decide. The system remembers.

Everything your admissions team needs from first inquiry to final decision.

Dashboard

Applicant Packets

One Review Queue

Program Publishing

Fit + Readiness Signals

Cycle Timeline

Messaging

Analytics

Review Workspace

Audit + Permissions

Internal trial. No charge.

Good to know.

Admissions should befaster, clearer, and easier to trust.

Less paperwork. Better applicant context.
Faster review.